Notably, the concern that empty blocks could potentially duplicate or conflict with other blocks due to their minimal content is effectively addressed through specific technical implementations.

Empty blocks are unique entities within the blockchain network. They are capable of claiming the block subsidy as a reward, which distinguishes them from potential duplicates that might claim similar rewards. This distinction is crucial in maintaining the integrity of the blockchain and ensuring that each block has a specific place and purpose within the ledger.

The technical mechanism that facilitates this uniqueness involves the use of a witness commitment within the empty block. This commitment remains constant, as the coinbase transaction's Witness Transaction ID (wtxid) is replaced by a standard value (uint256{0}). An illustrative example of this can be observed in a Signet transaction (mempool.space/signet/tx/d62676348ef1dfa05f8c5380bcccb1dc8c1bea4877e50495d577fd4f4c2f09e5), where an empty block contains only the coinbase transaction. This transaction includes the "witness reserved value" as its witness data and a specific witness commitment, further illustrating the process that ensures every block's uniqueness, even in the absence of additional transactions.

Moreover, the possibility of ensuring further uniqueness through variations in future blocks is highlighted by the observation that all coinbases from a specific list feature an nLocktime of 0 and an nVersion of 1. Adjusting these values could serve as an additional measure to guarantee the distinctiveness of each block, supplementing the already robust mechanisms in place to prevent duplication and uphold the blockchain's orderly structure.

This technical exploration underscores the sophisticated design and thoughtfulness embedded within the blockchain infrastructure, showcasing how even seemingly minor elements like empty blocks are integral to the system's overall function and security.